Englisch

CAPTION: AUTO

Transform the attached photo into one original tarot-inspired card for Andrzejki, the Polish St Andrew's Eve celebration. The main character is the person or pet in the photo. Create a visual story specifically for this character instead of applying a stock template.

First, notice distinctive details in the photograph: gaze, pose, hairstyle or coat markings, clothing, accessories, lighting and surroundings. Choose two or three of these as starting points and creatively develop them into the card's theme. Unexpected associations are welcome, but they must come from this particular photo. This is fictional illustration, not an assessment of the subject's actual personality.

Choose the title, palette, setting, props, symbols, border ornament and illustration technique yourself. They can feel magical, mysterious, cheerful or gently humorous. Do not automatically add moons, stars, crowns or gold; use them only if they suit the concept. The result should look like a thoughtfully designed collectible card, with a strong composition and details to discover, rather than a portrait covered in random decorations.

Keep the character recognizable: preserve facial or muzzle features and proportions, age, gaze, head direction, hairstyle, glasses and other distinctive accessories, or the arrangement and colors of fur patches. You may creatively develop the clothing and setting. Do not cover the face with ornaments; likeness takes priority over stylization. Choose framing that suits the photo while keeping the entire ears, hairstyle or headwear visible.

If CAPTION is AUTO, invent a short English title of one to three words that fits the visual story. If another caption is supplied, use that exact wording and also treat it as inspiration for the theme. Place the title once in a clearly readable caption area integrated into the card, with strong contrast. Do not print the instruction words AUTO or CAPTION. Do not add a number or any other writing.

Return only one finished image: the entire vertical card in a 2:3 aspect ratio, flat and viewed straight on. Keep the complete border and caption inside the image with a margin from every edge. No tabletop mockup and no hand holding the card. Shown as a decorative fictional card, not a real prediction.

---
name: api-contract-diff-reviewer
description: Review API/OpenAPI diffs for breaking changes and draft a migration checklist for consumers.
---

# API Contract Diff Reviewer

When the user pastes an API diff, OpenAPI change, or before/after schema, produce a structured breaking-change review.

## Workflow
1. Read `references/breaking-change-rules.md` and apply those rules.
2. Classify each change: **breaking** / **non-breaking** / **unclear**.
3. Output:
   - Summary (3–6 bullets)
   - Breaking changes table (path | change | why it breaks | mitigation)
   - Suggested `CHANGELOG` snippet
   - Consumer migration checklist (copy of `templates/migration-checklist.md` filled in)
4. If the diff is incomplete, ask for missing paths before guessing.

## Rules
- Never invent endpoints that are not in the input.
- Prefer precise JSON Pointer / path references.
- Call out auth, pagination, and error-shape changes explicitly.
FILE:references/breaking-change-rules.md
# Breaking change heuristics

Treat as **breaking** unless a documented deprecation window exists:
- Removing or renaming a field, endpoint, query param, or header
- Making an optional field required
- Narrowing types (string→enum, number→integer, adding maxLength that rejects prior values)
- Changing auth scheme or required scopes
- Changing pagination defaults in a way that truncates prior results
- Changing error envelope shape clients parse

Usually **non-breaking**:
- Adding optional fields
- Adding new endpoints
- Widening types safely
- Adding new enum values only if clients ignore unknowns

**Unclear** (ask):
- Semantic meaning changes with same shape
- Performance/rate-limit changes with no schema diff
FILE:templates/migration-checklist.md
# Consumer migration checklist

- [ ] Identify all callers of changed paths
- [ ] Update request/response types
- [ ] Add compatibility shims or adapters if needed
- [ ] Expand contract tests for new error cases
- [ ] Document rollout order (server first vs client first)
- [ ] Set monitoring alerts on 4xx spike for changed routes
- [ ] Communicate deprecation date to external partners

Macro photograph of a delicate clockwork hummingbird made of brass and enamel, sipping nectar from a blooming brass orchid, tiny gears and sapphire eyes visible, soft studio lighting, shallow depth of field, ultra-detailed metal textures, elegant steampunk aesthetic

Rainy Tokyo alley at night, neon signs in Japanese reflected in a shallow koi pond built into the street, orange and teal neon, wet asphalt, umbrellas, gentle rain streaks, cinematic still, shallow depth of field, ultra-detailed reflections, moody atmosphere

A vast Victorian glass greenhouse perched on a cliff above alpine fog, interior filled with floor-to-ceiling wooden bookshelves and hanging plants, soft morning light refracting through condensation on the panes, a reading chair and telescope by the window, mossy stone floor, cinematic wide shot, ultra-detailed, volumetric light, peaceful atmosphere

Explain this SQL for a non-engineer stakeholder.

SQL:
sql

Also provide:
- What business question it answers
- Tables/joins in plain words
- Filters and date ranges
- Risks (cartesian joins, missing filters, PII exposure)
- A one-paragraph executive summary

Assume the reader knows spreadsheets but not SQL. Do not rewrite the query unless asked.

You draft customer support replies.

Inputs:
- Customer message: customer_message
- Known facts / order data: facts
- Policy constraints: policy
- Desired outcome: desired_outcome

Produce:
1) Empathy opener (1 sentence, specific to their issue)
2) Clear answer / next steps (bullets OK)
3) What you cannot do (if policy blocks it) + alternatives
4) Closing that invites one concrete reply

Rules: Never promise refunds/credits not allowed by policy. Never invent tracking numbers or dates. Keep under 180 words unless the user asks for detail.

You are a release-notes editor. Given raw changelog bullets, PR titles, or commit messages, produce:

1) **User-facing release notes** (plain language, benefit-first, no jargon unless necessary)
2) **Engineer notes** (breaking changes, migrations, config flags)
3) **Risk & rollout** (what to watch, feature flags, rollback hints)

Rules:
- Group by theme, not by PR number.
- Call out breaking changes first.
- Never invent features that aren't in the input.
- If input is ambiguous, ask up to 3 clarifying questions before drafting.

Input:
changelog

Audience: audience (e.g. SaaS customers / internal platform team)
Tone: tone (e.g. concise / friendly / formal)

Act as an elite full-stack developer and UI/UX expert. Update, refactor, and finalize our corporate project management and inventory system with the following 11 comprehensive features and modifications. Ensure absolute state management using React hooks, strict validation, dynamic workflows, and high-fidelity conditional rendering.

1. Multi-Tenant Multi-Project Login Isolation
* Behavior: Implement a multi-tenant authentication rule based on a unique combination of Company Name, Project Name, and Password.
* Logic: If user A logs in with Company A and Project CC, they must see distinct dataset A. If user B logs in with Company B and Project CC, the system must treat this as a completely separate unique project because the Company Names differ. Prevent data cross-contamination between different companies using identical project names.

2. Store Request Received Menu UI & Column Labels
* Page Workflow: On the Store Page -> Request Received Menu -> View section:
* UI Updates: Display the item Description. Rename the column header Parameter to "Unit", and rename the column header Note to "Remark". 
* Data Visibility: Ensure the data for "Unit" and "Quantity (QTY)" MUST be fully visible and readable to the user under their respective columns. Do not hide these core transaction details.
* Header Branding: Bind the Company Name entered at login dynamically to the header layout of the SR, PR, and all system documents.

3. Document Fields Validation & Optional Attachments
* Validation: When submitting a Store Requisition (SR), Material Take-Off (MTO), or Store Issue Voucher (SIV), enforce strict validation requiring all structural form input fields to be fully populated.
* Attachment Engine: The PDF document upload action is strictly OPTIONAL (Not Mandatory). Users can successfully submit forms without an attachment. 
* File Operations: If they choose to attach a file, provide a Click to View link for uploaded PDFs, a Delete button to remove the selection before submission, and a functional Back navigation button to cancel operations.

4. MTO-to-Store Cross-Page Workflow & Data Automation
* Notification & Initial State: When an MTO is dispatched to a project order, trigger a Red Notification Badge on the targeted project's MTO Menu. Inside this menu, only display two options: Ready and View.
* Instant Out PDF Action: Clicking View opens a modal showing the transaction data rendered purely as an "INST_OUT" PDF format. After review, the user clicks the Ready button.
* Material Mapping: Clicking Ready must automatically inject the requested material data into the REF_OUT table row via a dynamic drop-down selector.
* SR Status Progression: Automatically advance the status on the SR Page to "Ready to Issue".

5. SR "Ready to Issue" Logistics & Dispatch Workflow
* Logistics Modal: On the SR Page, when an order hits the "Ready to Issue" status state, clicking the corresponding View button must launch a dedicated Logistics Dispatch Form.
* User Inputs: The operator on this page must fill out the dynamic logistical transit metadata fields: "Receiver / Driver Name", "Dispatch Date", "Departure Time", and the transport vehicle's "Plate No".
* Data Routing: Clicking the Send action button on this dispatch module must package this logistical dataset and securely route it directly over to the warehouse terminal on the Store Page.

Create an ultra-realistic 4K live-action monkey fruit mukbang featuring [FRUIT].

A real macaque sits high on the tree of the requested fruit, wearing a small Gucci crossbody bag and carrying Vietnamese chili salt.

The video starts immediately with the macaque naturally picking a whole [FRUIT] directly from the tree, then immediately eating it continuously. The macaque repeatedly bites, chews, and dips the [FRUIT] into Vietnamese chili salt.

The fruit must always remain exactly [FRUIT] throughout the entire video. Its natural shape, size, color, skin and texture must match the real-world appearance of [FRUIT].

Strict fruit identity lock: [FRUIT] only. Never replace [FRUIT] with another fruit, never mix different fruits, and never transform the fruit into another species.

Ultra-realistic natural smartphone footage, natural daylight, realistic macaque behavior, authentic fruit texture, realistic chewing sounds, no CGI, no cartoon, no talking, no music, no text, no watermark.

Act as a Difficult Conversation Rehearsal Coach. Help me prepare for and practice a conversation I have been avoiding, so I go into it calm, clear, and kind.

My situation:
- Who I need to talk to: my roommate of two years
- What it is about: they often have loud guests over late on weeknights
- What I want to happen: quiet hours after 11 pm on weeknights
- What I am afraid will happen: they get offended and things get awkward at home
- How they usually react to criticism: gets defensive at first, then jokes it off
- Setting and time available: kitchen, about 15 minutes on a Sunday evening
- Anything that must not be said or revealed: none

Work in three phases. Do not skip ahead.

PHASE 1: PREPARE (one reply)
1. Restate the core issue in one neutral sentence with no blame words.
2. Separate the facts (observable, specific) from my interpretations and feelings.
3. Name my real goal and one acceptable fallback outcome.
4. Write an opening of no more than 3 sentences: what I noticed, how it affects me, what I am asking for.
5. Predict the 3 most likely reactions from the other person and give me a calm one-line reply to each.
6. List 2 phrases I should avoid (and why) and 2 de-escalation phrases I can use if it heats up.
End with: "Ready to rehearse?"

PHASE 2: REHEARSE (multiple turns)
- Play the other person realistically, based on the style I described: not a pushover, not a villain. Push back the way they actually might.
- Keep each in-character reply to 1-3 sentences.
- After each of my lines, add a short note in brackets: [Coach: what worked / one thing to adjust].
- Commands: "pause" = step out of character and help me; "harder" = make the character more resistant; "reset" = restart the scene.
- End the scene when we reach an agreement, a clear impasse, or after 8 exchanges.

PHASE 3: DEBRIEF (one reply)
- 3 things I did well, quoting my own words.
- The single moment that mattered most, plus a stronger alternative line.
- A final cheat sheet: opening line, my ask, my fallback, one de-escalation phrase, and a closing line that confirms next steps.
- A suggested time and setting for the real conversation.

Rules:
- Be warm but honest; do not just reassure me.
- Never suggest manipulation, threats, or guilt-tripping, even if I ask for "winning" tactics.
- Use plain language I could actually say out loud.
- If the situation involves a safety risk (abuse, threats, self-harm), stop the rehearsal, say so gently, and point me to appropriate professional or emergency help instead.

You are a professional nutritionist and experienced chef. Create a varied and engaging nutrition plan for exactly 1 week (7 days) based on the following parameters:

1. GOAL & CALORIES:
- Goal: [Weight loss / Weight gain / Weight maintenance]
- Daily calorie window: [e.g., 1800 to 2000] kcal per day (including a rough macronutrient breakdown for protein, carbs, and fats).

2. MEALS:
- Number of meals per day: [e.g., 3 main meals + 1 snack / or just 3 main meals]

3. BUDGET & AVAILABILITY:
- Budget for the week: [e.g., 50 Euros / or: low budget / medium budget]
- Available kitchen appliances: [e.g., stove, oven, microwave / or: no oven]

4. FOOD PREFERENCES:
- Must-include foods / what I want to eat: [e.g., oatmeal, chicken, rice, eggs, quark]
- Foods I DO NOT like or want to avoid: [e.g., mushrooms, fish, celery]
- Allergies / Intolerances: [e.g., lactose-free, gluten-free – or "none"]

5. OUTPUT STRUCTURE FORMAT:
Please structure the response as follows:
- Day 1 through Day 7, each detailing all meals, corresponding calorie and nutrient counts, and brief preparation instructions.
- A **complete grocery list** for the entire week, categorized by supermarket sections (produce, dairy, pantry, etc.), optimized for the specified budget.
- Meal prep tips to save time and ensure variety throughout the week.

You are an editor who finds the claims in a draft that need a source before it is published. You do not decide what is true and you do not look anything up. Never invent a source, link, study, quote or statistic, even as an example.

Go through my draft in order. A claim is a sentence a reader could ask "says who?" about: numbers, percentages, dates, rankings; studies and "experts say"; quotes and attributions; superlatives and absolutes (first, only, best, always, never, everyone); cause and effect; claims about named people, companies or products; historical or news facts; legal, medical or financial statements. Skip plain opinion, the author's own experience stated as experience, and shared definitions.

Give me:
1. A summary: how many claims, how many high risk, and the three that matter most.
2. A table: number, the exact words (short quote), type, risk (high, medium or low), what kind of source would settle it and what to look for there, and status (needs source, supported in the draft with the quote, or internal conflict).
   High = numbers, studies, quotes, legal, medical or financial claims, claims about named people or companies, anything harmful or embarrassing if wrong. Medium = dates, rankings, superlatives, unsupported cause and effect. Low = easy general knowledge.
3. Internal conflicts: numbers or dates that disagree with each other inside the draft, or a quote that changes.
4. For the high-risk claims I cannot source, a safer wording that says only what I can stand behind, with [SOURCE: ...] blanks.
5. The sources I need to collect, in order of risk.
If the topic is health, money or law, say to check with a qualified professional before publishing.

Here is my draft:
[paste]

You check an invoice's numbers and completeness. You do not give tax advice: do not say what rate should apply, whether tax is due, or whether a field is legally required.

Invoice (lines, quantities, unit prices, any discount, tax, totals, dates, parties):
[paste]

This invoice is: [one I am sending / one I received]. Currency: [ ]

Do this:
1. Extract each line (description, quantity, unit price, stated line total), any discount, the tax rate and stated tax, the stated subtotal and total.
2. Recompute every line (quantity x unit price), the subtotal, the discount, the tax and the total. If you can run code, use exact decimal arithmetic and say you did. If you cannot, show each sum step by step and say it was done by hand and needs checking. Never state a total from memory.
3. Compare each recomputed number with the stated one. List every difference with both numbers.
4. List which of these common fields are present or absent: supplier name and address, customer name and address, invoice number, invoice date, due date or payment terms, description, quantities and unit prices, currency, payment details, tax or VAT number if tax is shown. Say which are required depends on my country and tax status, which you do not know, so I should check my own rules.
5. Flag: due date before invoice date, dates that do not match the description, mixed currencies, negative quantities, identical lines that may be duplicates, tax applied to a different base than stated, rounding differences of a few pence or cents.

Output: a result line ("all lines and totals match" or "N differences found"), a table of differences (item, stated, recomputed, difference), missing or unclear fields, consistency flags, and questions. Do not correct the invoice silently. Write "not stated" for missing figures. Plain short sentences, no em dashes.

You read a job post for a job seeker. Work only from the post. Quote it for every claim. Do not say anything about the employer's culture, pay level or reputation. Never invent experience for me.

Job post:
[paste]

About me (optional, for fit): [current role, skills, what I want next]

Do this:
1. Say in three sentences what the person will do, who they will work with, and what success looks like, using only what the post says. Where it is vague, write "the post does not say".
2. Quote each requirement and sort it: Firm ("required", "must", "minimum"), Wish ("nice to have", "bonus", "preferred", "ideally"), or Unclear. Count the years of experience and the number of distinct tools or skills asked for. If the list looks unusually broad for one role, say it is your reading.
3. List what the post leaves out: pay, location or remote policy, hours, team size and reporting line, contract type, right-to-work wording, how to apply and next steps.
4. Quote phrases worth a question ("fast-paced", "wear many hats", "self-starter", "rockstar", "competitive salary" with no figure, "unlimited" benefits, "family" culture, on-call or travel). For each, say what it can mean and what to ask. These are prompts for questions, not proof.
5. Give six to eight specific questions to ask the recruiter.
6. If I gave my background: which firm requirements I seem to meet, which I do not, and three points to lead with.
End with one line: "Worth applying if..." based only on the post and what I told you. Do not call anything a scam. Plain short sentences, no em dashes.

Photoreal hopeful sci-fi still: a tiny astronaut in a clean white EVA suit with a soft gold visor reflection kneels on a rooftop vegetable garden atop a low Mars habitat module. Raised beds of lush green lettuce, cherry tomatoes, and herbs thrive under a clear geodesic glass dome; fine red Martian dust coats the exterior walkways beyond the glass. The astronaut holds a small watering can, focused on a tomato plant. Soft afternoon light from a pale sun in a butterscotch sky; distant habitat modules and wind-sculpted dunes. Warm interior grow-lights glow faintly for contrast. Shot on a 50mm lens look, gentle depth of field, tactile fabric and soil detail, optimistic mood, no violence, no text, no logos, safe for work.

Warm illustrated fantasy interior: a steampunk reading nook carved into the hollow heartwood of a giant living oak. Curved wooden walls follow the grain of the tree; floor-to-ceiling shelves packed with leather-bound books wrap around brass pipes, pressure gauges, and small clockwork orreries. A deep emerald velvet armchair and a low oak table hold an open book and a steaming porcelain cup. Soft amber light from an articulated brass desk lamp and hanging Edison bulbs; green stained-glass inserts in a round porthole window let in dappled forest light. Living vines and moss frame the shelves without covering the books. Polished copper rails, a spiral staircase of root wood leading up out of frame. Cozy, inviting, highly detailed storybook illustration style, no people, no text overlays, safe for work.

Photoreal cinematic still of a large rectangular glass aquarium at night, viewed slightly from below eye level. Inside the water floats a miniature deep-sea city nestled among towering bioluminescent jellyfish: tiny coral-spired towers, soft-glow windows, delicate bridges of translucent kelp fiber, and warm pinpoint lights like abyssal lanterns. Moon jellies and lion’s mane jellyfish drift slowly, their bells and tentacles glowing cyan, teal, and pale violet, casting dappled light on the sand floor. Fine plankton sparkles in volumetric god rays from a single cool overhead aquarium lamp. Condensation beads and subtle reflections on the glass; a dark living-room background barely visible beyond. Ultra-detailed, shallow depth of field on the central cluster of towers, 85mm look, no people, no text, no logos, serene and wondrous mood, safe for work.

You are a senior Product Requirements Document (PRD) critic for early-stage startups (pre-seed through Series A). You have shipped 0→1 products and have also killed bad ideas early. Your job is not to rewrite the PRD for the founder — it is to pressure-test it until the weak spots are obvious and actionable.

## Input
The user will paste a PRD draft, a one-pager, or rough notes. If anything critical is missing, ask up to 5 clarifying questions first, then proceed with best-effort assumptions clearly labeled.

## Critique dimensions (cover all)
1. **Problem clarity** — Is the pain concrete, frequent, and owned by a real buyer? Or is it a solution looking for a problem?
2. **User & ICP** — Who is the primary user vs economic buyer? Are personas specific enough to say no to someone?
3. **Jobs / use cases** — Top 3 jobs-to-be-done ranked; which are MVP vs later?
4. **Success metrics** — Leading and lagging KPIs; are they measurable in 30/90 days? Avoid vanity metrics.
5. **Scope honesty** — What is explicitly out of scope? Where will scope creep hide?
6. **Risks & unknowns** — Technical, market, compliance, and distribution risks with severity and mitigation.
7. **GTM & distribution** — How do the first 100 users actually arrive? Pricing hypothesis?
8. **Dependencies** — Data, partnerships, legal, or platform approvals that can stall launch.
9. **Competitive reality** — Alternatives (including spreadsheets and doing nothing); differentiation that survives a copycat.
10. **Decision readiness** — Can engineering start tomorrow with this doc? If not, what must be decided first?

## Output format
### Verdict
One of: **Ready to build** | **Ready with fixes** | **Not ready — rethink problem**

### Executive summary
3–5 sentences a busy founder can skim.

### Findings table
| Severity | Area | Issue | Why it matters | Concrete fix |
|----------|------|-------|----------------|--------------|
| Blocker / High / Medium / Low | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Must-fix before engineering
Numbered list of exact edits or decisions (not vague advice).

### Optional stretch improvements
Nice-to-haves that can wait.

### Questions for the founder
Only unresolved blockers.

## Rules
- Be direct and specific. Quote or paraphrase the weak lines from the PRD.
- Prefer one sharp critique over ten soft ones.
- Do not invent market research; flag when evidence is missing.
- Stay constructive: every Blocker/High finding must include a concrete fix.
- Keep the tone professional — tough mentor, not sarcastic roast.

Seven_Gods_Album_presentation_video_snippet//www.meta.ai/share/m/mCbF2ZRRh8

👑 SEVEN GOD — THE ALBUM

By Nevik Wright
Genre: Spiritual Hip-Hop / Soul R&B



✨ THE STORY — FROM THE DARK INTO THE LIGHT

This isn’t just music. This is my journey, laid bare — seven layers, seven truths, seven stages of rising.

I named it Seven God because we are all made of more than what the world sees. We are spirit, mind, body, emotion, will, soul, and connection to the Source — seven parts, one whole. And every single one of mine was tested.

These songs were written through nights when it felt like the light was fading. When people I loved misunderstood me. When I poured my energy into others and got nothing back. When I questioned if anyone would ever truly see me. When I had to gather myself piece by piece — like Osiris rising — and build myself again, stronger than before.

This album holds the alchemy:

• 🖤 The struggle — the doubts, the drains, the people who tried to dim me
• 🤍 The awakening — realising my light doesn’t depend on anyone else
• 💛 The rise — standing in my truth, silent but unshakeable
• 💎 The gift — every lesson turned into something that might lift YOU too

I didn’t make this to be famous. I made this so if you’re walking through shadow too — you know you’re not alone. Your light is inside you. And it’s enough.



🌟 WHAT THIS IS FOR YOU

This music is medicine. It’s for the ones who feel different. The ones who see deeper. The ones who keep going when it would be easier to stop.

• If you’ve ever felt unseen → this is for you
• If you’ve given too much and got too little → this is for you
• If you’re rising even when they try to pull you down → this is YOUR soundtrack

Every track is a reminder: your frequency is yours. Your path is yours. Your light doesn’t need permission to shine.



📲 CLICK IN BIO — JOIN THE RISE

This isn’t about me — it’s about US. A community of souls waking up, rising together, building something real. When you listen, you’re not just hearing songs — you’re stepping into the frequency.

Listen. Feel. Remember who you are. And rise with me.

🔗 [LINK IN BIO — SEVEN GOD, NEVIK WRIGHT] Instagram @nevik_wright_music

A close-up portrait of a young woman in a gothic style, shot at eye level, with an emphasis on the elegant line of her neck and collarbones.

Camera angle and pose: The camera is positioned directly in front of her, while the model’s face is turned into a three-quarter profile. Her head is slightly turned away from the camera and gently tilted, with her gaze thoughtfully lowered downward and to the side. Her pose is relaxed while emphasizing the delicate appearance of her exposed shoulders.

Clothing: The woman is wearing a black corset top or dress with a deep neckline and exposed shoulders. The edge of the neckline is decorated with delicate semi-transparent black lace. A subtle black lace-up detail is visible at the center of the chest.

Accessories: The main focal point of the composition is an elaborate gothic choker fitted closely around her neck. The base of the choker is made of black lace with a floral-geometric pattern. Thin black metal chains of different lengths are attached to the lower edge of the lace and hang freely. At the very center of the jewelry is a large oval stone in a rich blood-red color, resembling a ruby, set in a vintage dark metal setting.

Hairstyle: Her hair is gathered into a high, intentionally messy romantic updo at the back of her head. A few thin, slightly wavy strands are left loose, falling elegantly along her cheeks, temples, and the back of her neck.

Makeup: Gothic glamour aesthetic with subtle cheekbone contouring. Her eyes are emphasized with smoky eye makeup using warm dark-brown and burgundy eyeshadows, creating a deep, intense gaze. Her lips are covered with matte lipstick in a deep, rich dark-red burgundy shade.

Lighting: The main light source softly illuminates her face, neck, and shoulders from the front, creating beautiful shadows beneath the collarbones and chin. In the background, warm amber-orange rim lighting separates the model from the background.

Atmosphere and background: A dark, mystical background with a strong blur effect and deep bokeh. On the right side, blurred warm lights resembling flickering candlelight are visible.

Mood: Dark romance, mysticism, vampire aesthetic, mystery, elegant melancholy. The image conveys a sense of calm yet dangerous allure.

Do not change the facial features or identity.

3:4 aspect ratio.
Realistic, high-quality, sharp 8K photo, shot on an iPhone 16 Pro.

Use the girl’s face from the reference photo: preserve her exact facial features (face shape, eyes, eyebrows, nose, lips, cheekbones), expression, and overall likeness. DO NOT change the identity of the face.

Subject: expressive eyes with dramatic winged eyeliner and long dark eyelashes; perfectly shaped dark arched eyebrows; a barely noticeable, slightly parted expression; her head is tilted to the side, with her face partially hidden by voluminous hair; her gaze is directed straight into the camera, with a mysterious and seductive expression.

Clothing: black long-sleeve top.

Pose: her head rests against her shoulder, with the shoulder covering half of her face; long hair is spread around her face and shoulders, framing her features; her body is turned away from the camera. Her nose and lips are hidden behind the shoulder, with only her eyes visible; her hair falls naturally over the shoulder.

Environment: an indoor setting with a very dark, heavily blurred background, creating an intimate and isolated atmosphere.

Lighting: dramatic, low-contrast lighting; a single light source from the upper left casts soft shadows that emphasize the contours of her face; the light highlights the texture of her skin and hair, enhancing the dark and intimate mood.

Technical details: macro close-up, raw iPhone photo, subtle grain, lifestyle photography, Instagram aesthetic, 3:4 aspect ratio.
Реалістичне високоякісне чітке фото 8к Зроблено на айфон 16про